Skip to content

Conversation

@markusschaber
Copy link

As discussed in #206. Partly based on work done by gappleto97 in #248.

@markusschaber
Copy link
Author

I just created my own (probably over-engineered) draft covering big integers, high precision floating point numbers, and fractions - please discuss: #249

Different to #248 by @gappleto97, I used different extension types for different things - thus, allowing do discuss the different aspects (big integers, high precision floats, fractions) separately, and also to add only selected ones to the spec.

@markusschaber markusschaber changed the title First draft of big number extensions Alternative draft of big number extensions May 7, 2018
@ecorm
Copy link

ecorm commented Dec 1, 2021

This proposal does not specify the binary format of the payload: two's compliment, signed magnitude, or one's compliment. Most arbitrary-precision integer libraries use signed magnitude. If signed magnitude were to be used, then the sign must appear somewhere in the message frame.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants