Skip to content

Add 'name' to resources - #8

Merged
jspahrsummers merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
justin/resource-names
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Add 'name' to resources#8
jspahrsummers merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
justin/resource-names

Conversation

@jspahrsummers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Resolves #5.

@dsp-ant dsp-ant left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be optional? i am slightly worried the more optionality we bake in, the harder it gets for clients to fully support.

@jspahrsummers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I was thinking if it's not specified, rendering as the URI is probably acceptable. But we could equally make the server specify that, I guess?

@dsp-ant

dsp-ant commented Sep 26, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yea, so if we could make it required and servers who have no better name, can just put the uri into the name.

@jspahrsummers
jspahrsummers merged commit e47d2d8 into main Sep 26, 2024
@jspahrsummers
jspahrsummers deleted the justin/resource-names branch September 26, 2024 19:26
jspahrsummers pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resources should include a human-readable name

2 participants