Skip to content

Conversation

@dsp-ant
Copy link
Member

@dsp-ant dsp-ant commented Jun 18, 2025

This is the release of the 2025-06-18 revision of MCP.

This was made possible by the contributions of:

and the MCP Steering Committee.

@cjellick
Copy link

cjellick commented Jun 18, 2025

Looking forward to this! Quick question: I noticed that this PR does not contain a new dated schema entry at schema/2026-06-18. Is that intentional? If so, will a new schema get released eventually?

Apologies if this is a naive or otherwise bad question.

dsp-ant and others added 4 commits June 18, 2025 20:41
This is the release of the 2025-06-18 revision of MCP.

This was made possible by the contributions of:
  - @aaronpk (Aaron Parecki)
  - @bhosmer-ant (Basil Hosmer)
  - @cliffhall (Cliff Hall)
  - @connor4312 (Connor Peet)
  - @evalstate (Shaun Smith)
  - @ihrpr (Inna Harper)
  - @jonathanhefner (Jonathan Hefner)
  - @kurtisvg (Kurtis Van Gent)
  - @localden (Den Delimarsky)
  - @mntlty (Ariel Deitcher)
  - @pcarleton (Paul Carleton)
  - @SamMorrowDrums (Sam Morrow)
  - @siwachabhi (Abhimanyu Siwach)
  - @wdawson (Wils Dawson)
  - @xiaoyijun (Xiao Yijun)

and the MCP Steering Committee.
@dsp-ant
Copy link
Member Author

dsp-ant commented Jun 18, 2025

Looking forward to this! Quick question: I noticed that this PR does not contain a new dated schema entry at schema/2026-06-18. Is that intentional? If so, will a new schema get released eventually?

Apologies if this is a naive or otherwise bad question.

no i just missed it in the DRAFT

Copy link
Member

@pcarleton pcarleton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@bhosmer-ant bhosmer-ant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@dsp-ant dsp-ant merged commit f5ccad9 into main Jun 18, 2025
7 checks passed
@dsp-ant dsp-ant deleted the davidsp/2025-06-18 branch June 18, 2025 20:07
blkt added a commit to blkt/modelcontextprotocol that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
In the PR releasing a new revision of the spec (modelcontextprotocol#783), commit e547813
changed a `SHOULD` to `MUST` in Lifecycle Operation section, but the
change was not backported to the draft file.

This PR backports the change avoiding potential regressions.
blkt added a commit to blkt/modelcontextprotocol that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
In the PR releasing a new revision of the spec (modelcontextprotocol#783), commit e547813
changed a `SHOULD` to `MUST` in Lifecycle Operation section, but the
change was not backported to the draft file.

This PR backports the change avoiding potential regressions.
dsp-ant pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
* Backport changes to `lifecycle.mdx` from `2025-06-18` to `draft`.

In the PR releasing a new revision of the spec (#783), commit e547813
changed a `SHOULD` to `MUST` in Lifecycle Operation section, but the
change was not backported to the draft file.

This PR backports the change avoiding potential regressions.

* Update docs/specification/draft/changelog.mdx

---------

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hefner <jonathan@hefner.pro>
RatStar811

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants