Skip to content

Conversation

@kant2002
Copy link
Contributor

@kant2002 kant2002 commented Oct 7, 2025

Motivation and Context

Closes #1621

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@kant2002 kant2002 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 20:09
Copy link
Member

@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per #1621 (comment), would you mind applying all of the changes from #1500 to the 2025-06-18 specification?

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hefner <jonathan@hefner.pro>
@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner enabled auto-merge (squash) October 9, 2025 19:01
@kant2002
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can somebody merge changes?

@jonathanhefner jonathanhefner merged commit 14b8990 into modelcontextprotocol:main Nov 3, 2025
4 checks passed
@kant2002 kant2002 deleted the kant/issue-1621 branch December 11, 2025 22:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect content shown in 5.2.2 Binary Content

3 participants