Fix incorrect name/title fields in ResourceContents documentation#1500
Merged
Fix incorrect name/title fields in ResourceContents documentation#1500
Conversation
Commit 1c54a77 (PR #663) incorrectly added 'name' and 'title' fields to ResourceContents examples in the documentation. According to the schema, these fields only exist on Resource objects (used in resources/list), not on ResourceContents (TextResourceContents/BlobResourceContents) which are used in: - resources/read responses - embedded resources in prompts and tools - resource update notifications This commit removes the incorrectly documented fields to match the actual schema definition where ResourceContents only contains: - uri (required) - mimeType (optional) - text or blob field depending on content type
pcarleton
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2025
9 tasks
This was referenced Oct 7, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit 1c54a77 (PR #663) incorrectly added 'name' and 'title' fields
to ResourceContents examples in the documentation. According to the schema,
these fields only exist on Resource objects (used in resources/list), not
on ResourceContents (TextResourceContents/BlobResourceContents) which are
used in:
This commit removes the incorrectly documented fields to match the actual
schema definition where ResourceContents only contains: