Reapply #79 without clientSecret - #81
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
I see. I did not have access to a clientId of a native app, so I used the one from our web app. I did not consult the documentation on how to get the accessToken but fiddled around until I got it working. I'm glad you modified it back to how it should be and merged it all in. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Zombaya (@Zombaya), it looks like the accessToken updates were likely due to registering an app as a web app instead of a native app. While you can use a clientSecret to obtain an access token, it is not supported (see Philippe Signoret (@psignoret)'s comment) in the revert.