Merged
Conversation
weswigham
reviewed
Sep 6, 2017
| return (arg: T) => f(arg) && g(arg); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function never(never: never): never { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should be in Debug and should be an assert, like assertNever. I also think that retaining the custom error messages which were at these sites prior to this is valuable; so it should have an (optional?) argument for the message. It should likely also defer to Debug.fail for throwing the error so it can pass the never asserting function as the stackCrawlMark so that there are not extra irrelevant stack frames in the error.
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Moved out of #18154.
This would add a
neverfunction which both:never.#18154 uses a function
assertTypeIsNeverbut handles the value regardless.I think @weswigham was going to add a similar function in one of his PRs.