Skip to content

hasProperty doesn't need to be generic#16650

Merged
1 commit merged into
masterfrom
hasProperty
Jun 20, 2017
Merged

hasProperty doesn't need to be generic#16650
1 commit merged into
masterfrom
hasProperty

Conversation

@ghost

@ghost ghost commented Jun 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This function doesn't actually look at the values, so no need to give them a type.

@ghost ghost requested a review from rbuckton June 20, 2017 17:45
@ghost ghost merged commit 4ef4882 into master Jun 20, 2017
@ghost ghost deleted the hasProperty branch June 20, 2017 19:13
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 14, 2018
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants