Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp from 9.3.3.v20150827 to 9.4.57.v20241219#8

Open
matrix-compute wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-33e2c8b48ee51a492df7c786ab9b54ba
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp from 9.3.3.v20150827 to 9.4.57.v20241219#8
matrix-compute wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-33e2c8b48ee51a492df7c786ab9b54ba

Conversation

@matrix-compute

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • java/ql/integration-tests/all-platforms/java/java-web-jsp/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
medium severity Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
SNYK-JAVA-ORGECLIPSEJETTY-8186158
  636   org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp:
9.3.3.v20150827 -> 9.4.57.v20241219
Proof of Concept

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…l to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-ORGECLIPSEJETTY-8186158
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the java Pull requests that update Java code label Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

java Pull requests that update Java code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants