Skip to content

Ask Appveyor to ignore certain branches. - #9286

Merged
tacaswell merged 1 commit into
matplotlib:masterfrom
Carreau:skip-autobackport
Oct 5, 2017
Merged

tacaswell merged 1 commit into
matplotlib:masterfrom
Carreau:skip-autobackport

Conversation

@Carreau

@Carreau Carreau commented Oct 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This should prevent the automatic backports to be tested both when the
branch is pushed by the backport bot, and when the PR is opened.

Hopefully the PR will be still be tested (that's unclear from the
AppVeyor docs).

This was discussed in
#9283 (comment)

And likely need to be also applied to other CI, but Appveyor is the most
annoying.

From this page:
https://www.appveyor.com/docs/branches/

I'm guessing this will have to be backported to all relevant branches.

cc @QuLogic @anntzer and @tacaswell

This should prevent the automatic backports to be tested both when the
branch is pushed by the backport bot, and when the PR is opened.

Hopefully the PR will be still be tested (that's unclear from the
AppVeyor docs).

This was discussed in
matplotlib#9283 (comment)

And likely need to be also applied to other CI, but Appveyor is the most
annoying.
@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Should've named this branch auto-backport-* to test. 😉

@Carreau

Carreau commented Oct 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Should've named this branch auto-backport-* to test.

Lol.

Still I can't push to MPL repo, so I guess it wouldn't have worked anyway :-)

@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the 2.1.1 (next bug fix release) milestone Oct 5, 2017
@tacaswell
tacaswell merged commit 589b953 into matplotlib:master Oct 5, 2017
tacaswell added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2017
@Carreau
Carreau deleted the skip-autobackport branch October 5, 2017 19:29
@tacaswell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@meeseeksdev backport to v2.1.0-doc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants