DOC: drop the experimental tag constrained_layout and tight_layout#17094
Merged
QuLogic merged 2 commits intoApr 13, 2020
Conversation
2f4e728 to
7c8b384
Compare
Member
Author
|
I guess this should get two approvals because it is dropping an "experimental" tag. |
tacaswell
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2020
timhoffm
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2020
Member
|
IMHO we should mention the transition to a stable feature in a what's new or API change entry. |
Member
Author
|
Sure, what's-new entry added. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
constrained_layoutwas marked experimental. Its been around for a couple of years with no indication that the API will change, and no complete show-stoppers so I propose to drop the experimental tag.Interestingly, as I grepped for "experimental"
tight_layoutwas deemed experimental as well.Both tutorials had useful information in the same clause as the experimental designation, so I tried to maintain that info in the rewrite.
PR Checklist