Skip to content

Conversation

@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Apr 3, 2019

Just some occurrences missed in da55037 (#13323); milestoning as 3.1 to match
that PR.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

Just some occurrences missed in da55037; milestoning as 3.1 to match
that PR.
@anntzer anntzer added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Apr 3, 2019
@dstansby dstansby modified the milestones: v3.1.0, v3.2.0 Apr 4, 2019
@dstansby
Copy link
Member

dstansby commented Apr 4, 2019

I've moved this to 3.2.0 since it doesn't look release critical.

@dstansby
Copy link
Member

dstansby commented Apr 4, 2019

Sorry, just read the original comment...

@dstansby dstansby modified the milestones: v3.2.0, v3.1.0 Apr 4, 2019
@dstansby dstansby merged commit 7fd463e into matplotlib:master Apr 4, 2019
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2019
@anntzer anntzer deleted the format_ticks branch April 4, 2019 16:43
dstansby added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2019
…874-on-v3.1.x

Backport PR #13874 on branch v3.1.x (Remove redundant call to Formatter.set_locs() before .format_ticks().)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants