Skip to content

TST: Update test images for new Ghostscript.#12366

Merged
QuLogic merged 2 commits into
matplotlib:masterfrom
QuLogic:update-images
Oct 3, 2018
Merged

TST: Update test images for new Ghostscript.#12366
QuLogic merged 2 commits into
matplotlib:masterfrom
QuLogic:update-images

Conversation

@QuLogic

@QuLogic QuLogic commented Oct 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR Summary

These are created using 9.24; just trying to see if that's what will fix it. @jklymak says Travis is now on 9.25. If this works, we should probably add some tolerances for old versions.

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • [N/A] Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • [N/A] New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • [N/A] Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • [N/A] Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • [N/A] Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

OK, even though I replaced the image, test_boxplot[pdf] is still failing. It also fails locally too.

I also don't understand why hatch_simplify seems to have gotten thicker lines but this never failed before.

@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

So hatch_simplify.pdf hasn't been changed since 2015, but in fact it should have changed with #6198 which unified the width of hatch lines across formats. Due to buggy Ghostscript I guess, this was never done.

@QuLogic QuLogic force-pushed the update-images branch 2 times, most recently from f98eb5e to 0b34cb7 Compare October 2, 2018 08:26

@jklymak jklymak left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems ready to go - should it still be WIP?

@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Possibly. Can someone who has an older ghostscript try it out to see if we need any higher tolerances for them?

@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v3.0.x milestone Oct 3, 2018
@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 3, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

In the interest of getting CI working, I'm going to merge this. If anyone has any problems, please open a PR with increased tolerance.

@QuLogic QuLogic merged commit 46ba49a into matplotlib:master Oct 3, 2018
@QuLogic QuLogic deleted the update-images branch October 3, 2018 08:17
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2018
@timhoffm

timhoffm commented Oct 3, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

FYI: This works with ghostscript 9.19.

@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 3, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Ah, good to know.

dstansby added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2018
…366-on-v3.0.x

Backport PR #12366 on branch v3.0.x (TST: Update test images for new Ghostscript.)
@jklymak

jklymak commented Oct 5, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@meeseeksdev backport to v3.0.0-doc

meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
jklymak added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
…366-on-v3.0.0-doc

Backport PR #12366 on branch v3.0.0-doc (TST: Update test images for new Ghostscript.)
@QuLogic

QuLogic commented Oct 12, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@meeseeksdev backport to v2.2.x

@QuLogic QuLogic modified the milestones: v3.0.x, v2.2.4 Oct 12, 2018
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2018
QuLogic added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
…366-on-v2.2.x

Backport PR #12366 on branch v2.2.x (TST: Update test images for new Ghostscript.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants