Repository navigation
Vertical alignment of tick labels with usetex=True #6323
Description
If I set
plt.rc('text', usetex=True)
the vertical alignment of tick labels is incorrect. For negative ticks, the tick labels are quite visibly lower than the positive marks. See the screenshot for an example.
A minimal working example:
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.close('all')
# import seaborn as sns
# sns.set_context("poster", font_scale=2)
fig = plt.figure()
plt.rc('text', usetex=False)
ax = fig.add_subplot(1,2,1)
plt.plot((-7.,0.,7.), (-1.,0.,1.), 'r-')
plt.rc('text', usetex=True)
ax = fig.add_subplot(1,2,2)
plt.plot((-7.,0.,7.), (-1.,0.,1.), 'r-')
plt.show()
The screenshot uses seaborn, as using its font properties exaggerates the error, but it is also visible without seaborn on close inspection.
In constructing this MWE, I discovered that the problem goes away if I reverse the order of the two plots, or if I set plt.rc('text', usetex=False) before plt.show().
I installed python 2.7.11 and matplotlib 1.5.1 via anaconda. I'm using the Qt4Agg backend, interactively.
Activity
WeatherGod commentedon Apr 21, 2016
attn: @mdboom. I am a bit disconcerted that the 2 and 4 (positive and
negative) in the left panel isn't lined up right, either, I think.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:48 AM, KeithWM notifications@github.com wrote:
mdboom commentedon Apr 25, 2016
TeX is returning bogus descender values for the negative sign. Haven't quite figured out why yet.
Fix matplotlib#6323: Fix vertical alignment of TeX text
Kojoley commentedon Jan 4, 2017
It is still the case
aseyffert commentedon Jan 28, 2020
A temporary workaround is to use LaTeX's
\phantom{}command; e.g, for a plot with xticks at[-2, -1, 0, 1, 2]you can manually set the xticklabels as:ax.set_xticklabels([r'$-2$', r'$-1$', r'$\phantom{-}0\phantom{-}$', r'$\phantom{-}1\phantom{-}$', r'$\phantom{-}2\phantom{-}$'])This causes LaTeX to affect a vertical shift in the positive labels as well (this is therefore not a fix but a workaround). The trailing
\phantom{}calls are necessary to maintain the horizontal alignment of the tick labels.anntzer commentedon Jan 29, 2020
I looked a bit into this and as it turns out it is intentionally that the minus sign has a nonzero descent: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/526103/why-does-cmsy10-tfm-give-the-minus-sign-a-positive-depth/ (thanks tex.stackexchange). Essentially, the tfm metrics are used (especially) to alignment of math formulae, rather than to determine rasterization bboxes, which is what we need here.
There are a few solutions here:
The advantage of the first two solutions is that (I think) this would allow us to get rid of the Tfm and possibly Vf classes, as we would be able to rely on freetype to get glyph metrics.