You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might be a controversial proposal, so I thought I'd get some discussion first.
In astropy, there is a "house style", which, surprising to me, included interactive: True. I wouldn't have expected a style to affect the interactive setting (which I see more as a user preference than affecting the style of the output). I'm going to advocate that astropy removes that but relatedly...
Would it make sense to filter out rcParams that don't really relate to style in style.use? I realize this somewhat breaks DWIM, but it does prevent a certain kind of shooting oneself in the foot...
This might be a controversial proposal, so I thought I'd get some discussion
first.
In astropy, there is a "house style", which, surprising to me, included interactive: True. I wouldn't have expected a style to affect the
interactive setting (which I see more as a user preference than affecting
the style of the output). I'm going to advocate that astropy removes that
but relatedly...
Would it make sense to filter out rcParams that don't really relate to style
in style.use? I realize this somewhat breaks DWIM, but it does prevent a
certain kind of shooting oneself in the foot...
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #4855
others might be the backend, keymaps, etc. As I was making the "classic"
style, I was conflicted in a few spots about what to explicitly set in the
style. I may be a bit overzealous when I made it and it could be trimmed
back before merging (once we figure out the whole font issue...).
This might be a controversial proposal, so I thought I'd get some
discussion
first.
In astropy, there is a "house style", which, surprising to me, included interactive: True. I wouldn't have expected a style to affect the
interactive setting (which I see more as a user preference than affecting
the style of the output). I'm going to advocate that astropy removes
that
but relatedly...
Would it make sense to filter out rcParams that don't really relate to
style
in style.use? I realize this somewhat breaks DWIM, but it does prevent
a
certain kind of shooting oneself in the foot...
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #4855
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #4855 (comment)
.
Activity
tacaswell commentedon Aug 3, 2015
👍 from me.
efiring commentedon Aug 3, 2015
Offhand, such a limitation sounds to me like a good idea.
On 8/3/15, Michael Droettboom notifications@github.com wrote:
WeatherGod commentedon Aug 3, 2015
others might be the backend, keymaps, etc. As I was making the "classic"
style, I was conflicted in a few spots about what to explicitly set in the
style. I may be a bit overzealous when I made it and it could be trimmed
back before merging (once we figure out the whole font issue...).
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Eric Firing notifications@github.com
wrote:
dopplershift commentedon Aug 3, 2015
👍 Less foot shooting is a good thing.
Fix matplotlib#4855: Blacklist rcParams that aren't style
Merge pull request #5440 from mdboom/blacklist-style-params
Merge pull request matplotlib#5440 from mdboom/blacklist-style-params