You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Under the old theme I think we had already removed the "show source" link (which I think are of limited value as it is the rst which I have never personally actually wanted). My preference here would be to remove the link in the template with a second choice option of moving the _source directory to hide it from the artifact upload (which leaves the PR build artifacts broken) and then moving it back for the commit.
I don't need the sources online, I just clicked on the link out of curiosity and because I didn't see it before, so removing the "show source" link is fine with me.
While I agree that source links are of limited value and could be removed, there has been work to make these point to GitHub #20673. At least some user and reviewers saw value in the links. This should be considered before removing.
Activity
tacaswell commentedon Sep 12, 2022
This is because we intentionally remove
_sourcedirectory in the circle config https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/blob/main/.circleci/config.yml#L145 . We did that because thestore_artifcatsuploads a file-at-a-time and we were spending an in ordinate amount of time in that.Under the old theme I think we had already removed the "show source" link (which I think are of limited value as it is the rst which I have never personally actually wanted). My preference here would be to remove the link in the template with a second choice option of moving the
_sourcedirectory to hide it from the artifact upload (which leaves the PR build artifacts broken) and then moving it back for the commit.StefRe commentedon Sep 12, 2022
I don't need the sources online, I just clicked on the link out of curiosity and because I didn't see it before, so removing the "show source" link is fine with me.
timhoffm commentedon Sep 13, 2022
While I agree that source links are of limited value and could be removed, there has been work to make these point to GitHub #20673. At least some user and reviewers saw value in the links. This should be considered before removing.
tacaswell commentedon Sep 16, 2022
My understanding is that #20673 is the links back to the Python source in the refernce docs. e.g. https://matplotlib.org/stable/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.animation.AbstractMovieWriter.html#matplotlib.animation.AbstractMovieWriter

whereas the source links here are to the
_source/blah.rstthat sphinx adds to the source of page you are looking at.I think the first are very useful and the second are of limited use.
timhoffm commentedon Sep 16, 2022
You're right. Me 🐑
we should remove the rst source links.