Skip to content

basic units example's subclassing is broken #19841

Open

Description

@QuLogic

Bug report

Bug summary

In basic_units.py, the TaggedValue has a __new__ method that does the following:

def __new__(cls, value, unit):
# generate a new subclass for value
value_class = type(value)
try:
subcls = type(f'TaggedValue_of_{value_class.__name__}',
(cls, value_class), {})
return object.__new__(subcls)
except TypeError:
return object.__new__(cls)

However, when value_class is not object, then object.__new__(subcls) raises:

In [1]: class A: 
   ...:     def __new__(cls, value): 
   ...:         value_class = type(value) 
   ...:         subcls = type(f'A_{value_class.__name__}', (cls, value_class), {}) 
   ...:         return object.__new__(subcls) 
   ...:                                                                                                                                     

In [2]: A(object())                                                                                                                         
Out[2]: <__main__.A_object at 0x7f9ce8a684c0>

In [3]: A(1.0)                                                                                                                              
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-6-04f0da727658> in <module>
----> 1 A(1.0)

<ipython-input-5-3b6ef5f2aee2> in __new__(cls, value)
      3         value_class = type(value)
      4         subcls = type(f'A_{value_class.__name__}', (cls, value_class), {})
----> 5         return object.__new__(subcls)
      6 

TypeError: object.__new__(A_float) is not safe, use float.__new__()

This means that the intended subclassing there never happens, as it falls back to the generic object.__new__ in the exception handler. I came across this while trying to fix #19535 with a conditional method, but of course, that never worked because the code always ended up using the generic non-subclass.

I tried to fix this by doing super().__new__ or value_class.__new__ (and then some object.<method> needed to be super().<method> in other methods), but this runs into issues with other classes that also override __new__, namely MaskedArray.

I think it makes sense to create subclasses (and then fix it so it actually leaves out methods that shouldn't be there), but I'm not sure that multiple inheritance is the right way to do it.

Matplotlib version

  • Matplotlib version (import matplotlib; print(matplotlib.__version__)): master at the moment
  • Matplotlib backend (print(matplotlib.get_backend())): n/a
  • Python version: 3.7.6

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Dec 8, 2023

    @github-actions

    This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help!

  2. QuLogic commented on Dec 8, 2023

    @QuLogic
    MemberAuthor

    This might be something for @ksunden to check on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions