-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.4k
[minor] sizes as area in square points #1099
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
API: changesChanges to the public API, typically requiring deprecation.Changes to the public API, typically requiring deprecation.DocumentationNew featurekeepItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github ActionItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github Action
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
API: changesChanges to the public API, typically requiring deprecation.Changes to the public API, typically requiring deprecation.DocumentationNew featurekeepItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github ActionItems to be ignored by the “Stale” Github Action
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
The docstring for various
sizesarguments states that size is given as symbol area in square points. Checking withmatplotlib.Collectionscode, this argument doesn't actually calculate the symbol area, but instead is a squared scale factor. This might lead to a wrong interpretation especially if irregularly-shaped symbols are used, but it also not correct for circles. On a more general basis, is it not easier to use linear scale factor as an argument, instead of its square? I just don't see applications where the latter is more useful than the former.