You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Random image failures with test_curvelinear4 #10602
The Travis output indicates that we should be able to download the result images as a tarball, but I haven't been able to access the given URL. Is there some trick to it?
In 2 examples, one from Travis and the other from Appveyor, the mismatch is 0.011, but the tolerance is 0.01. My guess is that there has always been something slightly non-deterministic in this test, and whatever it is, it has simply gotten slightly worse. In the spirit of triage, I think we should just bump the tolerance to 0.02 and move on. Tracking down the root cause is probably not the best use of anyone's time right now.
Yes, when I transferred those examples from the source files into real tests, they were always a bit flaky, and I was always hopeful that things like #10403 will help with it (e.g., I've just noticed that set_axes_locator in the toolkit version does not set Axes.stale.)
Activity
QuLogic commentedon Feb 26, 2018
Also seems to affect AppVeyor, e.g., #10426 failed but then worked on rebuild.
efiring commentedon Feb 26, 2018
The Travis output indicates that we should be able to download the result images as a tarball, but I haven't been able to access the given URL. Is there some trick to it?
efiring commentedon Feb 26, 2018
In 2 examples, one from Travis and the other from Appveyor, the mismatch is 0.011, but the tolerance is 0.01. My guess is that there has always been something slightly non-deterministic in this test, and whatever it is, it has simply gotten slightly worse. In the spirit of triage, I think we should just bump the tolerance to 0.02 and move on. Tracking down the root cause is probably not the best use of anyone's time right now.
QuLogic commentedon Feb 26, 2018
Yes, when I transferred those examples from the source files into real tests, they were always a bit flaky, and I was always hopeful that things like #10403 will help with it (e.g., I've just noticed that
set_axes_locatorin the toolkit version does not setAxes.stale.)Bump a tolerance in test_axisartist_floating_axes.