Exposing read/search methods that accept a server timestamp - #1623
Merged
Conversation
It appears these methods have long worked. Will help the Mule connector out as we won't need to cast to the implementation to access them. The two commented-out methods accepting a Transaction do not work and it does not appear that they should work, so they were removed.
rjrudin
force-pushed
the
feature/search-timestamp
branch
from
November 30, 2023 00:30
03f9204 to
24e257f
Compare
BillFarber
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It appears these methods have long worked. Will help the Mule connector out as we won't need to cast to the implementation to access them.
The two methods accepting a Transaction do not work and it is not yet clear if they should work.