Looks good, though the message grammar is a little off. I would rephrase it as "Source %s is mapped despite being listed in ignoreUnknownSourceProperties." or "Source %s is being mapped despite appearing in ignoreUnknownSourceProperties.".

Thanks for the suggestion, gnuemacscoin! I have updated the validation messages as recommended.

Below are example warning/error messages generated by MapStruct using the format:
"Source %s mapped despite being listed in ignoreUnmappedSourceProperties."

• For a single source property:
"Source property 'email' is mapped despite being listed in ignoreUnmappedSourceProperties."

• For multiple source properties:
"Source properties 'email', 'username' are mapped despite being listed in ignoreUnmappedSourceProperties."

Let me know if you'd prefer a different phrasing.

@filiphr When you have a moment, could you please take a look at this PR? Your feedback would be appreciated.

Thank you, @filiphr!
Glad to hear the changes look good, and great to see the CI checks have passed.
Let me know if there’s anything else you'd like me to update. Otherwise, I’ll wait for you to proceed with the merge — looking forward to it! 🙂

Thanks @codeswithritesh, I've merged this

Thank you @filiphr