Skip to content

Conversation

@simonrw
Copy link
Contributor

@simonrw simonrw commented Dec 15, 2025

Motivation

While discusing #13496 I asserted that we can safely access resource["Type"] in the visitors since we validate that the Type key is always present. However this was not true! This PR resolves this

Changes

  • Add test deploying resource without a Type key
  • Validate that the type is present during the validation phase

# Motivation

While discusing #13496 I asserted that we can safely access `resource["Type"]` in the visitors since we validate that the `Type` key is always present. However this _was not true_! This PR resolves this

# Changes

* Add test deploying resource without a `Type` key
* Validate that the type is present during the modelling phase
@simonrw simonrw requested a review from pinzon as a code owner December 15, 2025 11:04
@simonrw simonrw added semver: patch Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes labels Dec 15, 2025
@simonrw simonrw added notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes semver: patch Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes labels Dec 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Test Results - Preflight, Unit

23 000 tests  ±0   21 157 ✅ ±0   6m 5s ⏱️ -15s
     1 suites ±0    1 843 💤 ±0 
     1 files   ±0        0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2c735e7. ± Comparison against base commit 037ba16.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Test Results (amd64) - Acceptance

7 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   3m 1s ⏱️ +9s
1 suites ±0   2 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2c735e7. ± Comparison against base commit 037ba16.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

LocalStack Community integration with Pro

  2 files    2 suites   31m 9s ⏱️
585 tests 472 ✅ 113 💤 0 ❌
587 runs  472 ✅ 115 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 2c735e7.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap

  5 files    5 suites   43m 27s ⏱️
609 tests 497 ✅ 112 💤 0 ❌
615 runs  497 ✅ 118 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 2c735e7.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Test Results - Alternative Providers

584 tests   325 ✅  17m 41s ⏱️
  1 suites  259 💤
  1 files      0 ❌

Results for commit 2c735e7.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes semver: patch Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants