Skip to content

Conversation

@localstack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR upgrades all the pinned Python dependencies.

@localstack-bot localstack-bot added area: dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file semver: patch Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases labels Sep 23, 2025
@localstack-bot localstack-bot added the docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes label Sep 23, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Test Results - Preflight, Unit

22 258 tests  ±0   20 517 ✅ ±0   15m 36s ⏱️ - 1m 4s
     1 suites ±0    1 741 💤 ±0 
     1 files   ±0        0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5fbb5b9. ± Comparison against base commit 4be950c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 23, 2025

S3 Image Test Results (AMD64 / ARM64)

    2 files  ±0    2 suites  ±0   8m 14s ⏱️ -31s
  532 tests ±0  480 ✅ ±0   52 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 064 runs  ±0  960 ✅ ±0  104 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5fbb5b9. ± Comparison against base commit 4be950c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 23, 2025

LocalStack Community integration with Pro

    2 files  ±0      2 suites  ±0   1h 58m 17s ⏱️ +11s
4 674 tests ±0  4 352 ✅ ±0  322 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
4 676 runs  ±0  4 352 ✅ ±0  324 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5fbb5b9. ± Comparison against base commit 4be950c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@alexrashed
Copy link
Member

alexrashed commented Sep 23, 2025

FYI: This workflow failed since we upgraded to Python 3.13 with #13037, but the workflow in localstack/meta had Python 3.11 hard-coded.
This has been fixed with localstack/meta#30, and I retriggered a run of the upgrade action (creating this PR) to update this PR: Run #17938157933

Copy link
Member

@alexrashed alexrashed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! The updates are looking good, let's see if the pipelines are getting green / if the moto upgrade causes any issues. 🤞🏽 🤩

more-itertools==10.8.0
# via openapi-core
moto-ext==5.1.12.post22
moto-ext==5.1.13.post7
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This here contains the first automatic moto-ext upgrade where the release was created with localstack/moto#78. Since moto-ext was unpinned with #13147 these updates are just part of the normal dependency updates here.

@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results (amd64) - Acceptance

7 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   3m 22s ⏱️ +2s
1 suites ±0   2 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5fbb5b9. ± Comparison against base commit 4be950c.

@github-actions
Copy link

Test Results (amd64) - Integration, Bootstrap

    5 files  ±0      5 suites  ±0   2h 36m 25s ⏱️ +20s
5 048 tests ±0  4 566 ✅ ±0  482 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
5 054 runs  ±0  4 566 ✅ ±0  488 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5fbb5b9. ± Comparison against base commit 4be950c.

Copy link
Member

@silv-io silv-io left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@alexrashed alexrashed merged commit e4ea97e into main Sep 23, 2025
48 checks passed
@alexrashed alexrashed deleted the upgrade-dependencies branch September 23, 2025 09:19
@alexrashed alexrashed added the notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes label Sep 24, 2025
@alexrashed alexrashed added this to the 4.9 milestone Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file docs: skip Pull request does not require documentation changes notes: skip Pull request does not have to be mentioned in the release notes semver: patch Non-breaking changes which can be included in patch releases

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants