Skip to content

A.14 example #22

Closed
Closed

Description

@mnot

Putting this here because much of the community pays more attention here than to IETF lists -

We received an errata report on JSON Patch that asks to change the A.14 example; see
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6902&eid=4419

At first glance, it seems reasonable to me (although really it's a text improvement, not an errata); any thoughts?

Activity

  1. brettz9 commented on Jul 21, 2015

    @brettz9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions