Putting this here because much of the community pays more attention here than to IETF lists - We received an errata report on JSON Patch that asks to change the A.14 example; see http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6902&eid=4419 At first glance, it seems reasonable to me (although really it's a text improvement, not an errata); any thoughts?
Activity
brettz9 commentedon Jul 21, 2015
FWIW, I see other people had trouble with this section's example too: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24419391/how-is-the-tilde-escaping-in-the-json-patch-rfc-supposed-to-operate