Native (and fast) Time#xmlschema (iso8601)#8856
Merged
enebo merged 1 commit intojruby:masterfrom Jun 3, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Solves: jruby#8476 Related: ruby/ruby#11510 I was looking for something to learn (J)Ruby internals and this one looked like something within my ability, so here is my stab at it. Benchmarks: ~5-10x faster than JRuby 10.0.0.1 + ~1-2x faster than CRuby 3.4.3. The main difference with CRuby is that I make use of getNanos() for the fraction digits since `subsec` is derived from getNanos() in JRuby, so we can skip the subsec logic I believe. Similar to `inspect`. I tried a couple of iterations of a similar implementation to CRuby but it would always result in worse performance. I noticed some methods in ConvertBytes that have very similar number / digit to byte(s) logic, but I ended up making the logic a bit more focused on xmlschema needs (for performance), so I didn't re-use the existing ones. Let me know if there are any suggestions / ideas, or feel free to change it yourself directly.
Member
|
@PChambino This looks great. I do think at times we need some standard utilities for number to bytes but ConvertBytes is I think too ambitious in that it tries to solve all the things. Just running against CI since it required approval to run. |
Member
|
Great work! The pure-Ruby version was always intended to be temporary, so we would pass tests needed to get JRuby 10 out the door. I'm very happy you went ahead and finished porting this into Java! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Solves: #8476
Related: ruby/ruby#11510
I was looking for something to learn (J)Ruby internals and this one looked like something within my ability, so here is my stab at it.
Benchmarks: ~5-10x faster than JRuby 10.0.0.1 + ~1-2x faster than CRuby 3.4.3.
The main difference with CRuby is that I make use of getNanos() for the fraction digits since
subsecis derived from getNanos() in JRuby, so we can skip the subsec logic I believe. Similar toinspect.I tried a couple of iterations of a similar implementation to CRuby but it would always result in worse performance.
I noticed some methods in ConvertBytes that have very similar number / digit to byte(s) logic, but I ended up making the logic a bit more focused on xmlschema needs (for performance), so I didn't re-use the existing ones.
Let me know if there are any suggestions / ideas, or feel free to change it yourself directly.