Merged
Conversation
Member
|
@jsyeo If I have compiled with the previous visitor API will this still run with this generic version once compiled? Since JVM does type erasure I think it will but I am not positive. Do you know? I consider AST an internal API more or less for jruby proper but I still like to avoid compat errors if possible. |
Member
|
I believe it still looks identical (returning Object) if it claims to return T. |
Contributor
Author
Yes. I have tested it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the AST's accept methods were returning
Objectinstead of the generic type.