Skip to content

Conversation

@gibson042
Copy link
Member

I didn't see a sane place to reference the bypass prefixes (cf. https://github.com/jzaefferer/commitplease#usage ), but they really should be publicized to contributors to prevent unnecessary frustration.

Ref jzaefferer/commitplease#23

@timmywil timmywil added the Build label Dec 10, 2014
@dmethvin
Copy link
Member

dmethvin commented Jan 7, 2015

Before we land this, we'll need to ensure the the commits done during the release script don't crap out. I'd be most comfortable if we just disabled it for those commits, nothing would be worse than dying in the middle of a release. @jzaefferer Do commits prefixed with [STUFF] exempt from the component check? The docs weren't clear and I was too lazy to read through the code.

/cc @timmywil who has the jquery-release tasks

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Member

Looking at build/release.js, you're not doing any custom commits. I've used jquery-release for QUnit's 1.16 release, which includes the commitplease component list. I see no reason why you'd have any issues either.

@jzaefferer
Copy link
Member

I think the only commits are for the tag itself, which commitplease has an exception for, the other is prefixed with "Build:", which you're listing here as a valid component. So yes, its fine!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's this one? I think for UI and QUnit we dump release-related commits into "Build".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

20ea807
de7702a
1d93106

They're distinct enough from Build to make this a worthwhile component, in my opinion.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gibson042 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2015
@gibson042 gibson042 closed this in 0c9d018 Jan 11, 2015
gibson042 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants