Skip to content

Conversation

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@leobalter
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@dmethvin
Copy link
Member

dmethvin commented Jun 2, 2014

LGTM. Do we even want AUTHORS.txt now? Between the log and the .mailmap it seems like we have all the info we need.

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member Author

AUTHORS.txt is much nicer than pointing people to the raw data.

@markelog
Copy link
Member

markelog commented Jun 2, 2014

How about – https://github.com/jquery/jquery/graphs/contributors? Although author list 224 people, whereas github shows only 100 (no more than 100?)

@mgol
Copy link
Member

mgol commented Jun 2, 2014

This is a matter of presentation. Obviously, all contributor info is in the repo & AUTHORS.txt can always be re-generated.

While most non-jQuery projects I know don't have a dedicated AUTHORS.txt file, I can see how this can work as an incentive to contribute & get one's name in the easily readable file. Whether it's important enough to keep the file, I don't know.

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member Author

While many projects don't maintain an AUTHORS file, it's certainly done by a fair amount of projects. A quick check shows that node, polymer, and grunt do the same.

scottgonzalez added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2014
(cherry-picked from 4f776e5)

Closes gh-1587
scottgonzalez added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants