You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Would you welcome a tested alias migration from source-map-resolve? #1446
I maintain that package. It is a compatibility-first MIT fork that preserves the seven-function CommonJS API, callback and synchronous behavior, asynchronous scheduling, and error metadata while adding maintained packaging and correcting Windows cross-drive URL handling. This is routine maintenance, not a vulnerability claim, and Stackline is not affiliated with or endorsed by the original maintainer.
Would you welcome a focused PR that:
changes the existing key to the exact alias "source-map-resolve": "npm:@stackline/source-map-resolve@1.0.0";
regenerates yarn.lock without changing imports;
initially retains the repository's local ambient declaration to avoid unrelated type changes; and
runs yarn run build and yarn run test:mocha-coverage through the existing Linux/Windows matrix?
Staying on the reviewed 0.6.0 pin or replacing these test helpers with a narrower maintained implementation are also reasonable options. I wanted maintainer agreement before preparing a dependency PR because this repository's contribution guidance asks for an issue before significant changes.
Activity