I don't know if this is meant to be intentional or not, but the name is just awful. I fear that it will lead new developers learning about the JAMStack to think this is the defacto option for the JAMStack. And personally, trying to become popular by piggybacking off the name of an existing technology or architecture type to confuse users, just doesn't seem right.
So please, don't try to be intentionally confusing and either stick a disclaimer that this uses JAMStack philosophies and is not 'The JAMStack' or think about changing the name.
I don't know if this is meant to be intentional or not, but the name is just awful. I fear that it will lead new developers learning about the JAMStack to think this is the defacto option for the JAMStack. And personally, trying to become popular by piggybacking off the name of an existing technology or architecture type to confuse users, just doesn't seem right.
So please, don't try to be intentionally confusing and either stick a disclaimer that this uses JAMStack philosophies and is not 'The JAMStack' or think about changing the name.