Repository navigation
Conversation
…n blocks 🤖🤖 The continuation prefix was built after the statement counter had been incremented, so it had one dot more than the prompt and block_parser treated the continuation lines as output. Closes ipython#15453
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #15453.
In pure-python mode the continuation prefix (
...:) was built after the statement counter had been incremented, so a multi-line 10th or 100th statement got one dot more than its prompt.block_parserthen read its continuation lines as output, and only the first line ran. The prefix is now built when the statement starts.The first commit adds only the test, so it can be checked out to see it fail.
AI usage
🤖🤖 Claude Code. A Claude Sonnet agent found the cause while I was reporting the issue; Claude Opus 5.5 wrote this fix and the test. I don't know the effort level either ran at. I directed the work and read the whole diff.