Skip to content

Commit e2d17bd

Browse files
committed
Meta/cook: update explanation of next and seen
1 parent 6b8507d commit e2d17bd

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-9
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-9
lines changed

cook

Lines changed: 8 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -288,16 +288,15 @@ sub blurb_text {
288288
$next_at ||= '0' x 40;
289289
$text ||= <<'EOF';
290290
Here are the topics that have been cooking in my tree. Commits
291-
prefixed with '-' are only in 'seen' while commits prefixed with '+'
292-
are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the
293-
integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. Generally,
294-
being in 'next' is a sign that a topic is stable enough to be used
295-
and are candidate to be in a future release, while being in 'seen'
296-
means nothing more than that the maintainer has found it interesting
297-
for some reason (like "it may have hard-to-resolve conflicts with
291+
prefixed with '+' are in 'next' (being in 'next' is a sign that a
292+
topic is stable enough to be used and are candidate to be in a
293+
future release). Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'seen',
294+
which means nothing more than that I have found them of interest for
295+
some reason (like "it may have hard-to-resolve conflicts with
298296
another topic already in flight" or "this may turn out to be
299-
useful")---do not read too much into a topic being in (or not in)
300-
'seen'.
297+
useful"). Do not read too much into a topic being in (or not in)
298+
'seen'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the
299+
integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
301300
302301
303302
Copies of the source code to Git live in many repositories, and the

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)