Commit b90d9b8
work around buggy S_ISxxx(m) implementations
There are buggy implementations of S_ISxxx(m) macros on some platforms
(e.g. NetBSD). The issue is that NetBSD doesn't take care to wrap its
macro arguments in parentheses, so on Linux and sane systems we have
S_ISREG(m) defined as something like:
(((m) & S_IFMT) == S_IFREG)
But on NetBSD:
((m & _S_IFMT) == _S_IFREG)
Since a caller in builtin/diff.c called our macro as `S_IFREG | 0644'
this bug introduced a logic error on NetBSD, since the precedence of
bit-wise & is higher than | in C.
[jc: took change description from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason's patch]
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>1 parent 349362c commit b90d9b8
1 file changed
+10
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
277 | 277 | | |
278 | 278 | | |
279 | 279 | | |
280 | | - | |
281 | | - | |
282 | | - | |
| 280 | + | |
| 281 | + | |
| 282 | + | |
| 283 | + | |
| 284 | + | |
| 285 | + | |
| 286 | + | |
| 287 | + | |
| 288 | + | |
| 289 | + | |
283 | 290 | | |
284 | 291 | | |
285 | 292 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments