|
| 1 | += Cruft packs |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +The cruft packs feature offer an alternative to Git's traditional mechanism of |
| 4 | +removing unreachable objects. This document provides an overview of Git's |
| 5 | +pruning mechanism, and how a cruft pack can be used instead to accomplish the |
| 6 | +same. |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +== Background |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +To remove unreachable objects from your repository, Git offers `git repack -Ad` |
| 11 | +(see linkgit:git-repack[1]). Quoting from the documentation: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +[quote] |
| 14 | +[...] unreachable objects in a previous pack become loose, unpacked objects, |
| 15 | +instead of being left in the old pack. [...] loose unreachable objects will be |
| 16 | +pruned according to normal expiry rules with the next 'git gc' invocation. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +Unreachable objects aren't removed immediately, since doing so could race with |
| 19 | +an incoming push which may reference an object which is about to be deleted. |
| 20 | +Instead, those unreachable objects are stored as loose object and stay that way |
| 21 | +until they are older than the expiration window, at which point they are removed |
| 22 | +by linkgit:git-prune[1]. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Git must store these unreachable objects loose in order to keep track of their |
| 25 | +per-object mtimes. If these unreachable objects were written into one big pack, |
| 26 | +then either freshening that pack (because an object contained within it was |
| 27 | +re-written) or creating a new pack of unreachable objects would cause the pack's |
| 28 | +mtime to get updated, and the objects within it would never leave the expiration |
| 29 | +window. Instead, objects are stored loose in order to keep track of the |
| 30 | +individual object mtimes and avoid a situation where all cruft objects are |
| 31 | +freshened at once. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +This can lead to undesirable situations when a repository contains many |
| 34 | +unreachable objects which have not yet left the grace period. Having large |
| 35 | +directories in the shards of `.git/objects` can lead to decreased performance in |
| 36 | +the repository. But given enough unreachable objects, this can lead to inode |
| 37 | +starvation and degrade the performance of the whole system. Since we |
| 38 | +can never pack those objects, these repositories often take up a large amount of |
| 39 | +disk space, since we can only zlib compress them, but not store them in delta |
| 40 | +chains. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +== Cruft packs |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +A cruft pack eliminates the need for storing unreachable objects in a loose |
| 45 | +state by including the per-object mtimes in a separate file alongside a single |
| 46 | +pack containing all loose objects. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +A cruft pack is written by `git repack --cruft` when generating a new pack. |
| 49 | +linkgit:git-pack-objects[1]'s `--cruft` option. Note that `git repack --cruft` |
| 50 | +is a classic all-into-one repack, meaning that everything in the resulting pack is |
| 51 | +reachable, and everything else is unreachable. Once written, the `--cruft` |
| 52 | +option instructs `git repack` to generate another pack containing only objects |
| 53 | +not packed in the previous step (which equates to packing all unreachable |
| 54 | +objects together). This progresses as follows: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + 1. Enumerate every object, marking any object which is (a) not contained in a |
| 57 | + kept-pack, and (b) whose mtime is within the grace period as a traversal |
| 58 | + tip. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | + 2. Perform a reachability traversal based on the tips gathered in the previous |
| 61 | + step, adding every object along the way to the pack. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + 3. Write the pack out, along with a `.mtimes` file that records the per-object |
| 64 | + timestamps. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +This mode is invoked internally by linkgit:git-repack[1] when instructed to |
| 67 | +write a cruft pack. Crucially, the set of in-core kept packs is exactly the set |
| 68 | +of packs which will not be deleted by the repack; in other words, they contain |
| 69 | +all of the repository's reachable objects. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +When a repository already has a cruft pack, `git repack --cruft` typically only |
| 72 | +adds objects to it. An exception to this is when `git repack` is given the |
| 73 | +`--cruft-expiration` option, which allows the generated cruft pack to omit |
| 74 | +expired objects instead of waiting for linkgit:git-gc[1] to expire those objects |
| 75 | +later on. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +It is linkgit:git-gc[1] that is typically responsible for removing expired |
| 78 | +unreachable objects. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +== Alternatives |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Notable alternatives to this design include: |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | + - The location of the per-object mtime data, and |
| 85 | + - Storing unreachable objects in multiple cruft packs. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +On the location of mtime data, a new auxiliary file tied to the pack was chosen |
| 88 | +to avoid complicating the `.idx` format. If the `.idx` format were ever to gain |
| 89 | +support for optional chunks of data, it may make sense to consolidate the |
| 90 | +`.mtimes` format into the `.idx` itself. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +Storing unreachable objects among multiple cruft packs (e.g., creating a new |
| 93 | +cruft pack during each repacking operation including only unreachable objects |
| 94 | +which aren't already stored in an earlier cruft pack) is significantly more |
| 95 | +complicated to construct, and so aren't pursued here. The obvious drawback to |
| 96 | +the current implementation is that the entire cruft pack must be re-written from |
| 97 | +scratch. |
0 commit comments