Commit aabec94
committed
Merge bitcoin#17719: Document better -keypool as a look-ahead safety mechanism
f41d589 Document better -keypool as a look-ahead safety mechanism (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
If after a backup, an address is issued beyond the initial
keypool range and none of the addresses in this range
is seen onchain, if a wallet is restored from backup, even in
case of rescan, funds may be loss due to the look-ahead
buffer not being incremented and so restored wallet not detecting
onchain out-of-range address as derived from its seed.
This scenario is theoretically unavoidable due to the requirement
of the keypool to have a max size. However, given the default
keypool size, this is unlikely. Document better keypool size
implications to avoid user setting a too low value.
While reviewing bitcoin#17681, it took me a while to figure out the safety implications of keypool, I find it would be better to document this a bit farther to avoid users shooting themselves in the foot. For further context & discussion, see bitcoin#17681 (comment)
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f41d589. Just "Warning:" prefix added since the last review
jonatack:
ACK f41d589 code review and build/test. The added `Warning:` since last review is a good addition.
Tree-SHA512: d3d0ee88fcdfc5c8841a2bd4bada0e4eeb412a0dce5054e5fb023643c2fa57206a0f3efb06890c245528dc4431413ed2fd5645b9319d26245d044c490b7f0db02 files changed
+6
-1
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
46 | 46 | | |
47 | 47 | | |
48 | 48 | | |
49 | | - | |
| 49 | + | |
50 | 50 | | |
51 | 51 | | |
52 | 52 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
74 | 74 | | |
75 | 75 | | |
76 | 76 | | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
77 | 82 | | |
78 | 83 | | |
79 | 84 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments