Skip to content

Release redis 0.1.0 #5310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
crwilcox merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2018
Merged

Release redis 0.1.0 #5310

crwilcox merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2018

Conversation

@crwilcox
Copy link
Contributor

@crwilcox crwilcox commented May 8, 2018

This pull request was generated using releasetool.

@crwilcox crwilcox requested a review from lukesneeringer as a code owner May 8, 2018 17:41
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label May 8, 2018
@crwilcox crwilcox merged commit 7b74564 into master May 8, 2018
@crwilcox
Copy link
Contributor Author

crwilcox commented May 8, 2018

Release is at https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-python/releases/tag/redis-0.1.0

@crwilcox crwilcox deleted the release-redis-0.1.0 branch May 18, 2018 17:44
@tseaver tseaver added packaging api: redis Issues related to the Memorystore for Redis API. and removed api: redis Issues related to the Memorystore for Redis API. labels Sep 17, 2018
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2023
@crwilcox
Release 0.1.0 (#5310)
4969c3a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lukesneeringer lukesneeringer Awaiting requested review from lukesneeringer

1 more reviewer

@theacodes theacodes theacodes approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

api: redis Issues related to the Memorystore for Redis API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. packaging

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@crwilcox @theacodes @tseaver @googlebot