-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Release Spanner v0.30.0 #4732
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release Spanner v0.30.0 #4732
Conversation
|
Must be rebased on #4730 before merging. |
dhermes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM mostly
spanner/CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Implementation Changes | ||
|
|
||
| - The underlying autogenerated client library was re-generated to pick up new features and resolve bugs. (#4695) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
spanner/CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| - The underlying autogenerated client library was re-generated to pick up new features and resolve bugs. (#4695) | ||
| - Made sure **exactly** one of `start_*`/`end_*` are passed to KeyRange. (#4618) | ||
| - Made `row`, `consume_all`, and `consume_next` private (#4492) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
|
||
| - Brought Spanner README more in line with others. (#4306, #4317) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Testing |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@tseaver I was going to mention that in my review, thanks for pointing it out. |
|
#4492 is a breaking change, as well: it removed the |
|
Reverting it. We can revisit it at a later time if needed. |
680c451 to
4efea87
Compare
|
Rebased and good to merge when CI is green and api_core 0.1.4 is released (#4730) |
|
@jonparrott That change was suggested by @vkedia |
|
@chemelnucfin two different breaking changes were discussed, which were you referring to? The change of making a few members private was not reverted and I'm totally cool with it. |
|
The few member private ones. _row and _consume_next.
sorry for not being clear. Trying to deal with the spanner keys issue
right now.
…On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Jon Wayne Parrott ***@***.*** > wrote:
@chemelnucfin <https://github.com/chemelnucfin> two different breaking
changes were discussed, which were you referring to? The change of making a
few member private was *not* reverted and I'm totally cool with it.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4732 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADzDDKEquhaGj577OYd_-Hwip9jx8dx5ks5tJV2EgaJpZM4RaEjd>
.
|
4efea87 to
ded35a1
Compare
|
#4735 is now included, thanks, @chemelnucfin. Waiting for CI and then merging. :) |
No description provided.