Skip to content

Conversation

@chemelnucfin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Dec 1, 2017
@dhermes dhermes added the api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. label Dec 1, 2017
@chemelnucfin chemelnucfin reopened this Dec 4, 2017
@chemelnucfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Must have closed the wrong one.

Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to ditch usage docs for individual transactions altogether: the Spanner team would prefer that everyone use database.run_in_transation, I believe.

@chemelnucfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

So do I still merge this or just delete the file?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Dec 4, 2017

Merge it. I was just speculating that the whole chapter might be unwanted (by the Spanner team).

@chemelnucfin chemelnucfin merged commit 53944d5 into googleapis:master Dec 4, 2017
alixhami added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants