-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Preparing PyLint for subpackage breakup. #2392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preparing PyLint for subpackage breakup. #2392
Conversation
cb9317d to
18e1785
Compare
| parser = get_parser() | ||
| args = parser.parse_args() | ||
| main(build_root=args.build_root) | ||
| verify_modules(build_root=args.build_root) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
tseaver
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
| parser = get_parser() | ||
| args = parser.parse_args() | ||
| main(build_root=args.build_root) | ||
| verify_modules(build_root=args.build_root) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The docstrings don't get included in the module objects so there is no reason to have them.
|
@tseaver Sorry I just realized I left out the important part: Taking the docstrings out of namespace package |
|
@tseaver LMK if the 2nd commit was problematic. |
|
@dhermes Nope. |
Co-authored-by: Anthonios Partheniou <partheniou@google.com>
This change started out in #2367 but I figured we'd get it out of the way here since it's not as much in dispute.