Skip to content

Conversation

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Sep 20, 2016

  1. Originally started as a check for which files didn't have license headers (due to Moving core into designated package. #2367 (comment))
  2. Used a script to verify: https://gist.github.com/dhermes/17177b603e2b22902334947d9871529c
  3. Maybe we should incorporate the script into our build rule to prevent files checked in with bad or missing license headers?
  4. Should the script be extended to incorporate more than just Python files?

Done via:

$ git grep -l '# Copyright 2016 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved.' | \
> xargs sed -i 's/All Rights Reserved/All rights reserved/g'
Also adding license headers where they are missing.

Also had to tweak the max lines allowed in a test module
due to added license header.

Used: https://gist.github.com/dhermes/17177b603e2b22902334947d9871529c
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 20, 2016
@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor

I'm 👍 for point number 3. I added #2371 to discuss.
I think for number 4, that might be up to legal?

These updates LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants