Skip to content

Conversation

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver commented Mar 15, 2016

No description provided.

@tseaver tseaver added the api: logging Issues related to the Cloud Logging API. label Mar 15, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Mar 15, 2016


def setUpModule():
_helpers.PROJECT = TESTS_PROJECT

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@tseaver tseaver changed the title System test for 'logger.log_text' and 'logger.log_struct'. Add system test for 'logger.log_text' and 'logger.log_struct'. Mar 15, 2016
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Mar 17, 2016

@dhermes any remaining issues?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Mar 17, 2016

Rebased after merging #1616 to the logging-api branch.

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Mar 17, 2016

LGTM. The eventual consistency hack might be easier to find if you factor it out into a helper (like is done in the bigtable test).

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Mar 17, 2016

The eventual consistency hack might be easier to find if you factor it out into a helper (like is done in the bigtable test).

I've been thinking about a more generic retry wrapper (per #1619).

tseaver added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2016
Add system test for 'logger.log_text' and 'logger.log_struct'.
@tseaver tseaver merged commit 57fed8a into googleapis:logging-api Mar 17, 2016
@tseaver tseaver deleted the logging-system_test-logger_log branch March 17, 2016 13:45
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Mar 18, 2016

@tseaver I made a generic retry wrapper in #535

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: logging Issues related to the Cloud Logging API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants