Add TreeSpec to support dataclass-based nested specs (Issue #13)#21
Open
Pranav-0440 wants to merge 2 commits intogoogle-deepmind:masterfrom
Open
Add TreeSpec to support dataclass-based nested specs (Issue #13)#21Pranav-0440 wants to merge 2 commits intogoogle-deepmind:masterfrom
Pranav-0440 wants to merge 2 commits intogoogle-deepmind:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a minimal TreeSpec implementation to dm_env to support structured
action and observation specifications using Python dataclasses. This directly
addresses Issue #13 ("Tree Spec").
✔ What is added
TreeSpecclass in specs.py._generate_tree_value()helper to generate valid test values.test_tree_spec_generate_value.✔ Why this is useful
Many JAX-based RL environments define structured I/O using dataclasses.
While dm_env already supports tuple/dict specs, dataclass-based specs were not
recognized, causing type checking and clarity issues. TreeSpec provides an
explicit and type-safe way to represent these structures.
✔ Compatibility
This feature is fully backward-compatible and does not modify any existing spec
behavior. All existing tests pass (166 passed).