mv: report missing destination leading directory#2356
Conversation
When moving a file to a destination whose leading directory does not
exist, "git mv" fails at the rename(2) syscall with ENOENT. Because
the error is reported via die_errno() using only the source path:
fatal: renaming 'src' failed: No such file or directory
the message misleadingly blames the source, even though it is the
destination's parent directory that is missing. A user who runs
git mv a/file b/does-not-exist/file
is told the problem is with 'a/file', which exists, giving no hint
that 'b/does-not-exist/' needs to be created first.
The checking phase already rejects a missing destination directory
when the destination ends in a slash, but a destination that names a
file inside a non-existent directory is not caught and only fails
later at rename(2). As a result "git mv -n" also fails to detect the
problem, since the dry run never reaches the syscall and reports a
move that would not actually succeed.
Detect this during the checking phase instead: for entries that will
be renamed on disk, stat the destination's leading directory and, if
it is missing, fail with the existing "destination directory does not
exist" message. Guard the check with the same condition under which
rename(2) is invoked so that directory moves, whose child entries are
expanded to paths under a not-yet-created directory, and sparse or
out-of-cone destinations, which are not written to the worktree, are
not flagged incorrectly.
This gives a clear message and lets "git mv -n" report the failure.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Zamboni Orioli <lucaszam0@gmail.com>
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @ZamboniL, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax: NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txtTo iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description): To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join git-mentoring@googlegroups.com, where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
|
/allow |
|
User ZamboniL is now allowed to use GitGitGadget. WARNING: ZamboniL has no public email address set on GitHub; GitGitGadget needs an email address to Cc: you on your contribution, so that you receive any feedback on the Git mailing list. Go to https://github.com/settings/profile to make your preferred email public to let GitGitGadget know which email address to use. |
|
/preview |
|
Preview email sent as pull.2356.git.git.1784125730775.gitgitgadget@gmail.com |
|
/submit |
|
Submitted as pull.2356.git.git.1784125963694.gitgitgadget@gmail.com To fetch this version into To fetch this version to local tag |
|
Ben Knoble wrote on the Git mailing list (how to reply to this email): > Le 15 juil. 2026 à 10:51, Lucas Zamboni Orioli via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> From: Lucas Zamboni Orioli <lucaszam0@gmail.com>
>
> When moving a file to a destination whose leading directory does not
> exist, "git mv" fails at the rename(2) syscall with ENOENT. Because
> the error is reported via die_errno() using only the source path:
>
> fatal: renaming 'src' failed: No such file or directory
>
> the message misleadingly blames the source, even though it is the
> destination's parent directory that is missing. A user who runs
>
> git mv a/file b/does-not-exist/file
>
> is told the problem is with 'a/file', which exists, giving no hint
> that 'b/does-not-exist/' needs to be created first.
>
> The checking phase already rejects a missing destination directory
> when the destination ends in a slash, but a destination that names a
> file inside a non-existent directory is not caught and only fails
> later at rename(2). As a result "git mv -n" also fails to detect the
> problem, since the dry run never reaches the syscall and reports a
> move that would not actually succeed.
>
> Detect this during the checking phase instead: for entries that will
> be renamed on disk, stat the destination's leading directory and, if
> it is missing, fail with the existing "destination directory does not
> exist" message. Guard the check with the same condition under which
> rename(2) is invoked so that directory moves, whose child entries are
> expanded to paths under a not-yet-created directory, and sparse or
> out-of-cone destinations, which are not written to the worktree, are
> not flagged incorrectly.
I suppose this still allows a TOCTOU issue where the check succeeds and (with lucky timing) the destination then disappears?
In that case, I think a worthwhile additional change would also be for the error message to diagnose which file is missing (or at least include both source and destination).
Now, without checking I somehow doubt whether rename(2) tells us which entry is missing. Worse, if we check afterwards, we could have a « TOUTOC » :p where the entry reappears to confuse the error diagnosis.
So perhaps
fatal: renaming A -> B failed: no such file or directory
taking some inspiration from the -i modes of cp, mv?
> This gives a clear message and lets "git mv -n" report the failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Zamboni Orioli <lucaszam0@gmail.com>
> ---
> mv: report missing destination leading directory
>
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2356%2FZamboniL%2Fmv-detect-non-existing-target-folder-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2356/ZamboniL/mv-detect-non-existing-target-folder-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2356
>
> builtin/mv.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> t/t7001-mv.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/mv.c b/builtin/mv.c
> index e03823370c..a95531f0b2 100644
> --- a/builtin/mv.c
> +++ b/builtin/mv.c
> @@ -444,6 +444,27 @@ dir_check:
> goto act_on_entry;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If we are going to move SRC to DST on disk, DST's leading
> + * directories must already exist.
> + */
> + if (!(modes[i] & (INDEX | SPARSE | SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR)) &&
> + !(dst_mode & (SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR | SPARSE))) {
> + char *dst_dir = xstrdup(dst);
> + char *slash = strrchr(dst_dir, '/');
> +
> + if (slash) {
> + struct stat dir_st;
> + *slash = '\0';
> + if (lstat(dst_dir, &dir_st) < 0 && errno == ENOENT) {
> + free(dst_dir);
> + bad = _("destination directory does not exist");
> + goto act_on_entry;
> + }
> + }
> + free(dst_dir);
> + }
> +
> if (ignore_sparse &&
> (dst_mode & (SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR | SPARSE)) &&
> index_entry_exists(the_repository->index, dst, strlen(dst))) {
> diff --git a/t/t7001-mv.sh b/t/t7001-mv.sh
> index 920479e925..8a45997b33 100755
> --- a/t/t7001-mv.sh
> +++ b/t/t7001-mv.sh
> @@ -114,6 +114,20 @@ test_expect_success 'clean up' '
> git reset --hard
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'moving to non-existent destination parent directory' '
> + git reset --hard &&
> + mkdir -p from &&
> + echo content >from/file &&
> + git add from/file &&
> + test_must_fail git mv from/file no-such-dir/file 2>actual &&
> + test_grep "destination directory does not exist" actual
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'mv --dry-run detects non-existent destination parent directory' '
> + test_must_fail git mv -n from/file no-such-dir/file 2>actual &&
> + test_grep "destination directory does not exist" actual
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success 'moving to existing untracked target with trailing slash' '
> mkdir path1 &&
> git mv path0/ path1/ &&
>
> base-commit: 55526a18268bbc1ddaf8a6b7850c33d984eac9e9
> --
> gitgitgadget
> |
|
User |
|
Lucas Zamboni Orioli wrote on the Git mailing list (how to reply to this email): Em qua., 15 de jul. de 2026 às 13:50, Ben Knoble
<ben.knoble@gmail.com> escreveu:
> I suppose this still allows a TOCTOU issue where the check succeeds and (with lucky timing) the destination then disappears?
Thank you for the feedback, also great catch, this does end up with a
TOCTOU issue.
>
> In that case, I think a worthwhile additional change would also be for the error message to diagnose which file is missing (or at least include both source and destination).
>
> Now, without checking I somehow doubt whether rename(2) tells us which entry is missing. Worse, if we check afterwards, we could have a « TOUTOC » :p where the entry reappears to confuse the error diagnosis.
I think your suggestion of including both source and destination in the
error message is a good solution, I verified rename(2) just in case and
it does not provide the information about which file is missing.
So what I'm thinking of doing is change the error message to
fatal: renaming 'source/file' to 'destination/file' failed: No
such file or directory
'%s' to '%s' seems to be more in the pattern of other git messages
instead of the cp arrow style.
So for v2 I'll split this into two commits:
1. mv: name both source and destination when rename fails
(the die_errno change is race-free and always applicable)
2. mv: check for missing destination directory before renaming
(the checking-phase/dry-run detection)
The first stands on its own even if the second is dropped, so I'll
order it first.
Since this introduces a new message I'll leave the po/ files to the
l10n team, the new message adds one string and the early check reuses
the existing
'destination directory does not exist' one. |
cc: Ben Knoble ben.knoble@gmail.com