Skip to content

feat: Threading integration#258

Merged
untitaker merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/threading-integration
Feb 13, 2019
Merged

feat: Threading integration#258
untitaker merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/threading-integration

Conversation

@untitaker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix #114

cc @mmerickel

@codecov-io

codecov-io commented Feb 9, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #258 into master will increase coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 95.34%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #258      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.74%   81.91%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          32       33       +1     
  Lines        2750     2793      +43     
  Branches      444      447       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2248     2288      +40     
  Misses        340      340              
- Partials      162      165       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sentry_sdk/integrations/__init__.py 88.67% <100%> (+0.67%) ⬆️
sentry_sdk/integrations/threading.py 95% <95%> (ø)
sentry_sdk/worker.py 87.5% <0%> (-1.25%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f9d748...e936afc. Read the comment docs.

@mmerickel mmerickel left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great to me. Patching Thread.start is a smart way to do it.

@untitaker
untitaker merged commit 28133ca into master Feb 13, 2019
@untitaker
untitaker deleted the feat/threading-integration branch February 13, 2019 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants