Skip to content

Conversation

@Mastermind-sap
Copy link

@Mastermind-sap Mastermind-sap commented Oct 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a reference to a Todo App Flutter example in the projects list, providing users with an additional learning resource.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new hyperlink to "Todo App in Flutter" was added to the Example projects list in the documentation, expanding the available project references without modifying any existing content or logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation update
Projects/2-Intermediate/To-Do-App.md
Added a bullet point linking "Todo App in Flutter" to the Example projects list

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single-line content addition to a markdown file with no logic or code changes

Poem

🐰 A link to flutter projects, hopping through the docs,
One tiny bullet point that gently unlocks,
New paths for builders seeking their way,
Simple and sweet, the rabbit's bouquet! 🌱

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ⚠️ Warning The PR title states "Added implementation of ToDo App in Flutter," which suggests that code or functional implementation was added to the repository. However, according to the raw summary, the actual change is purely a content addition: a new bullet point linking to "Todo App in Flutter" was added to the Example projects list in a documentation file. The use of the word "implementation" is misleading because no functional code or implementation was added—only a reference link to an existing project was included in a list. The title should accurately reflect the nature of the change. A more accurate title would be something like "Added Todo App in Flutter to example projects list" or "Add Todo App in Flutter project reference," which would clearly convey that a documentation entry or link was added rather than an implementation.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e8dd00 and 5ce48dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Projects/2-Intermediate/To-Do-App.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Projects/2-Intermediate/To-Do-App.md (1)

32-32: Link is valid and project matches scope—approved.

Verification confirms the GitHub link is accessible (HTTP 200) and the project is indeed "A simple todo app using Flutter" written in Dart, matching the Intermediate tier and document scope. The formatting is consistent with existing example entries in the list.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant