Skip to content

feat(firebaseai): server prompt chat and function calling#17972

Open
cynthiajoan wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
firebaseai/server_prompt_session_function
Open

feat(firebaseai): server prompt chat and function calling#17972
cynthiajoan wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
firebaseai/server_prompt_session_function

Conversation

@cynthiajoan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is doing. If you're modifying existing behavior, describe the existing behavior, how this PR is changing it, and what motivated the change.

Related Issues

Replace this paragraph with a list of issues related to this PR from the issue database. Indicate, which of these issues are resolved or fixed by this PR. Note that you'll have to prefix the issue numbers with flutter/flutter#.

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]).
This will ensure a smooth and quick review process. Updating the pubspec.yaml and changelogs is not required.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • My PR includes unit or integration tests for all changed/updated/fixed behaviors (See Contributor Guide).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • The analyzer (melos run analyze) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require plugin users to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

@cynthiajoan cynthiajoan marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2026 18:11
@cynthiajoan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces server-side template chat functionality with function calling capabilities to the Firebase AI example app. Key changes include adding FlutterFire configuration, refactoring function calling utilities into a dedicated file, and implementing various chat sessions and UI elements for different function calling scenarios (auto, client override, stream). The core library now includes new TemplateChatSession and TemplateTool related classes, and model request methods have been updated to support these new parameters. Review comments highlight critical null-safety issues in TemplateChatSession.sendMessage and sendMessageStream where _autoFunctions is used without proper null assertion, potentially leading to compile errors or runtime crashes. Additionally, a high-severity bug was found in _serverTemplateUrlContext in server_template_page.dart where a user message is added twice to the UI, causing duplication.

Comment on lines +100 to +102
final shouldAutoExecute = _autoFunctions!.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions.containsKey(c.name));
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This line can cause a crash and won't compile as intended.

  1. _autoFunctions! will throw an exception if _autoFunctions is null. You should perform a null check first, like _autoFunctions != null.
  2. _autoFunctions.containsKey(c.name) will cause a compile error because _autoFunctions is a nullable type (Map?). You need to use the null-assertion operator (!) after the null check.

A safer implementation, consistent with sendMessageStream, would be:

final shouldAutoExecute = _autoFunctions != null &&
    _autoFunctions.isNotEmpty &&
    functionCalls.isNotEmpty &&
    functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions!.containsKey(c.name));
Suggested change
final shouldAutoExecute = _autoFunctions!.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions.containsKey(c.name));
final shouldAutoExecute = _autoFunctions != null &&
_autoFunctions.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions!.containsKey(c.name));

final shouldAutoExecute = _autoFunctions != null &&
_autoFunctions.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.isNotEmpty &&
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions.containsKey(c.name));
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This will cause a compile error because _autoFunctions is a nullable type (Map?), so you can't call containsKey on it directly. Since you've already checked that _autoFunctions is not null on line 183, you can safely use the null-assertion operator (!).

Suggested change
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions.containsKey(c.name));
functionCalls.every((c) => _autoFunctions!.containsKey(c.name));

await _handleServerTemplateMessage(
message,
(message) async {
_messages.add(MessageData(text: message, fromUser: true));
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The user's message is being added to the _messages list here, but it's also added inside the _handleServerTemplateMessage helper function (line 332). This will cause the user's message to be displayed twice in the UI. You should remove this line.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant