Skip to content

Update feathers-commons to version 0.6.0 🚀 - #210

Merged
daffl merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
greenkeeper-feathers-commons-0.6.0
Jan 21, 2016
Merged

daffl merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
greenkeeper-feathers-commons-0.6.0

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

feathers-commons just published its new version 0.6.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of feathers-commons – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • 9ff861d 0.6.0
  • 8ed5dc4 Merge pull request #15 from feathersjs/event-filtering
  • b60e176 Moving shared socket functionality to another repository
  • 8c99f22 Refactoring common socket setup into a service mixin
  • 9e03fbc Merge pull request #14 from feathersjs/socket-routes
  • c97bfde Support socket routes with apps mounted on a path

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@marshallswain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If these pass tests can they just be merged?

@ekryski

ekryski commented Jan 21, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think so

@daffl

daffl commented Jan 21, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yup. It only submits a PR if the current version range is incompatible or the tests passed for a version that should be compatible.

daffl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
…0.6.0

Update feathers-commons to version 0.6.0 🚀
@daffl
daffl merged commit 320c0f7 into master Jan 21, 2016
@daffl
daffl deleted the greenkeeper-feathers-commons-0.6.0 branch January 21, 2016 04:39
daffl added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants