docs: Fix minor wording issues#6490
Open
adrynalean wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: adrynalean <87601800+adrynalean@users.noreply.github.com>
ntkathole
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes a handful of small wording issues in the docs, including duplicated words, article usage, spelling of "separate", and one sentence that referenced three approaches after listing four.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Checks
git commit -s)Testing Strategy
Manual checks:
git diff --checkrg -n "a a tool|seperate|by the the|a example|no exception were|These three approaches|multiple entities are a subclass" docs/getting-started docs/reference docs/tutorialsMisc
Docs-only cleanup; no behavior changes.