Skip to content

Remove unused ingestion deps#520

Merged
feast-ci-bot merged 2 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
agoda-com:remove-unused-ingestion-deps
Mar 9, 2020
Merged

Remove unused ingestion deps#520
feast-ci-bot merged 2 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
agoda-com:remove-unused-ingestion-deps

Conversation

@ches
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ches ches commented Mar 8, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:

Remove unused deps from Ingestion module, for the usual reasons of Good Housekeeping.

My path to this:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

ches added 2 commits March 8, 2020 13:33
Unused according to `mvn -pl ingestion dependency:analyze`, and tests.

We had a recent bump of hibernate-validator with a CVE fix (feast-dev#421) that I
was looking to backport, and it turns out it's not used anymore anyway.
@ches ches added kind/housekeeping area/ingestion The ingestion Beam component and storage-related items labels Mar 8, 2020
@ches
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ches commented Mar 8, 2020

/assign @thirteen37

@ches
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ches commented Mar 8, 2020

Not sure yet whether this is flaky or a legitimate failure, but the failure mode of this test could stand to improve:

bq-batch-retrieval.py:201: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

.0 = <list_iterator object at 0x7f528fc18c10>

>   assert output["entity_id"].to_list() == [int(i) for i in output["feature_value2"].to_list()]
E   TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'NoneType'

bq-batch-retrieval.py:201: TypeError

I'll see if I can find a quick way to do that.

@ches
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ches commented Mar 8, 2020

/test test-end-to-end-batch

@ches ches added the backport-candidate Changes that may be desired for backport to earlier Feast release tracks label Mar 8, 2020
@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Mar 9, 2020

Thanks for this "housekeeping" pull @ches

Not sure yet whether this is flaky or a legitimate failure, but the failure mode of this test could stand to improve:

Our tests still have a lot of debt as you pointed out elsewhere.

Happy to merge this in.

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Mar 9, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ches, woop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit b15a5e6 into feast-dev:master Mar 9, 2020
@ches ches deleted the remove-unused-ingestion-deps branch March 9, 2020 04:32
@ches
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ches commented Mar 9, 2020

Our tests still have a lot of debt as you pointed out elsewhere.

We're getting to the point of running some e2e tests on our infra—sans Prow and sans Google Cloud-dependent tests—so hopefully we can pitch in to ones that bite us.

khorshuheng pushed a commit to khorshuheng/feast that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2020
* Make dependency:analyze run clean on datatypes-java

* Remove stale dependencies from ingestion

Unused according to `mvn -pl ingestion dependency:analyze`, and tests.

We had a recent bump of hibernate-validator with a CVE fix (feast-dev#421) that I
was looking to backport, and it turns out it's not used anymore anyway.
khorshuheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2020
* Make dependency:analyze run clean on datatypes-java

* Remove stale dependencies from ingestion

Unused according to `mvn -pl ingestion dependency:analyze`, and tests.

We had a recent bump of hibernate-validator with a CVE fix (#421) that I
was looking to backport, and it turns out it's not used anymore anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved area/ingestion The ingestion Beam component and storage-related items backport-candidate Changes that may be desired for backport to earlier Feast release tracks kind/housekeeping lgtm size/L

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants