Skip to content

Relax fastavro version requirement in Feast Python SDK#500

Merged
feast-ci-bot merged 1 commit intofeast-dev:masterfrom
davidheryanto:update-fastavro-version-requirement
Mar 5, 2020
Merged

Relax fastavro version requirement in Feast Python SDK#500
feast-ci-bot merged 1 commit intofeast-dev:masterfrom
davidheryanto:update-fastavro-version-requirement

Conversation

@davidheryanto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@davidheryanto davidheryanto commented Feb 27, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • Relax fastavro version requirement in Feast Python SDK so we can get the latest fastavro updates and do not force users who already have newer versions of fastavro to downgrade, in order to install Feast Python SDK.

Recently, we fix to fastavro==0.22.9 because fastavro==0.22.10 uses its internal implementation to represent UTC timezone but it is not compatible with Pandas. fastavro==0.22.11 reverts this to use pytz implementation which is compatible with Pandas.

fastavro/fastavro#396

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

NONE

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Feb 27, 2020

So fastavro==0.22.10 is still broken? If users have that version it would still break things right?

@davidheryanto davidheryanto force-pushed the update-fastavro-version-requirement branch from 0ca3472 to 78bb81d Compare February 29, 2020 10:42
@davidheryanto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Yes I updated the version range to

 "fastavro>=0.22.11,<0.23",

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidheryanto, woop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Mar 5, 2020

/lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants